Nansen was able to take risks and overcome difficult circumstances, like a scorpion, because I have Mercury and Venus in this sign, symbolizing courage in difficult circumstances. He was the creator of a new science – physical oceanography, which is consistent with the function of Mercury in Scorpio, which is not by chance ended up in his horoscope in opposition to Pluto. It can be called a theorist and practitioner of irresistible deal. No one task was not for him too heavy and impossible, that is so close characterization of the White Moon in Aquarius and the Dragon's Head in Capricorn. He was a man of a new era, for which there are no barriers and conventions. Even his amazing love for Russia finds an explanation in his horoscope.
In 1922, the League of Nations, he was appointed the first in the history of the High Commissioner for Refugees and founded the Nansen pasrportnoe Bureau, which issued thousands passports to refugees from Russia. In the same year he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for long-term efforts to assist vulnerable and disadvantaged. Larger share of the amount of 122 000 kroons, Fridtjof spent on device in the Soviet Union two agricultural stations. His book about Russia, he called the "Country of the Future". Obviously, the White Moon in Aquarius – the sign of Russia – played a crucial role in his horoscope. Nansen was not only expressed all of their planet, but the whole range of values of his horoscope.
After graduating in 1974, First Medical Institute,
But now, with States democratic with millions of inhabitants and thousands of square kilometers, was created the formula of representative democracy. View democracy as the right and even the duty, or freedom, which citizens have of being able to choose who will be since its does oppressor?, thus creating a new form of aristocracy or elite ruler, that few have the power to make decisions (not always the most successful), they will define the fate of all. Then we watch a majority choosing the minority that dominates them or rules, without the possibility of choosing or not choosing, other forms of action. Not to mention to what extent these minorities will represent the interests of the vast majority or without even knowing if such participation in politics will continue after closed voting urns. In short, democracy is not a Government of the people, by the people and for the people, said Lincoln, but rather a tyranny elected by the people for their subjugation.