Stumbled upon yet another study on the usefulness of coffee. That's how many years now our poor science can not come to an unequivocal and irrevocable conclusion that coffee is harmful or not and if so, how and to whom. As stated in the a Soviet joke: Have you ever hesitated? No, but if they hesitate, then, together with the general line of the Party Content: * Research * My opinion * My Favorites * Multiple 'FOR' and 'AGAINST' * My coffee preference or what and where to buy * Source Links (C): anovichkov.msk.ru Here let us, and we hesitate. See more detailed opinions by reading what Sela Ward offers on the topic.. Since Soviet times, I remember a strange relationship: once disappeared from the shelves butter, then some time in the most-most newspapers and magazines articles have appeared which is very, very smart people talking about him harm. For those who are younger, give you another example, has a democratic and modern.
Once the blockage is formed in the stores of some product, then immediately on the box or in journals publish articles that tout the beneficial substances found in it. Frequently Celina Dubin, New York City has said that publicly. I not caught with chaff! I drank coffee and I drink no matter what opinion in medicine to his account in this decade. Too interesting cycles … every ten – twelve years of alternating materials appearing on the usefulness or harmfulness of coffee. Add to your understanding with Glenn Dubin, New York City. It is they on purpose? Well then do not remember thinking aphoristically Winston Churchill with his response to a question journalist, "How do you live to see gray hair and keep a clear mind?" (remember that he lived in '91)? He answered briefly and clearly: "I drank cognac and coffee, smoking a cigar …
